Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
George Duke wrote on Mon, Aug 24, 2009 10:11 PM UTC:
(Now note please that I give Lemurian Shat. ''preeminente'' for the way-fun two Bent pieces and appreciate Joyce's recent overtures to Falcon starting array. He is very welcome for the one now named after himself there BRNKF...) I am looking at this again for 5 or 10 minutes, since I have a consistent point of view, and determine that I won't change my rating of 17.January.2008 two years ago. This is too much like Shatranj. If everybody did this we would have 1000 Shatranjs written up. A comment or Mutator in a thread would suffice, despite of course huge ramifications. Sometimes it's a fine line. This Modern Shatranj adds Ferz to Alfil and Wazir to General/Queen. Well, it says that, sort of, so no need to call attention to the past rating specifically, but Joe knows what the score is. In the opening paragraph Joyce writes, ''This page is an adaptation of the original Shatranj page on the Chess Variant Page. All else is the historic game,'' writing succinctly like he used to talk. Okay so what else is new? This M.S. could be explained in two sentences. If neat Bent Hero and Bent Shaman by Joyce's approach fully-realized would take two millennia, another two would be needed for many Shatranjs. Joyce has a point, if there are so many credits for so relatively minor change, there is no invention. Also, there is slight error that off and on there really was two-step, so that is error of CVPage original Shatranj (that I just relearned myself): mediaeval two-step was very occasional. Also annoying is before the list of 6 near the end he refers to M.S. as ''Chess,'' and other spots toward end of the write-up are confusing, for example, M.S. itself only uses 1 and 2 of the 6. Good grief, it's like looking into someone's unpolished notebook.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Modern Shatranj

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.