Comments by DavidHowe
In the case of a tie, the entry that received the most votes from the editors will be selected. If there is a still a tie, then the entry that received the most votes from the chief editors will be selected. If there is still a tie, then both/all of the tied entries will be selected.
The poll is now closed. Since there was a 3-way tie between Tamerlane Chess, Crazyhouse, and Marseillais Chess, the voting of the site editors must be counted and is as follows: Tamerlane Chess: 3 editor votes Crazyhouse: 2 editor votes Marseillais Chess: 3 editor votes Since this results in a tie between Tamerlane Chess and Marseillais Chess, the voting of the site's chief editors must be counted and is as follows: Tamerlane Chess: 1 chief editor votes Marseillais Chess: 2 chief editor votes Marseillais Chess is the next recognized variant. The next poll will be between Tamerlane Chess, Crazyhouse and Hostage Chess.
Doublechess will also appear in the next RV poll: 'Doublechess is one of the most popular CVs which can be played on Richard's Play By Email server. No other CV inventor has done more to supply sample games of his invention to your site than I have. I have been running Doublechess tournaments on Richard's PBM server almost since the day it was added. Take a look at the current published Doublechess Standings to see how many people have played it and how often they have played it. Doublechess' beauty lies in its simplicity. It contains no special pieces. Lay two standard chess boards side by side to create a 16 by 8 board. Use two chess sets and replace the second set of kings with a third set of queens. Lay the first army in the center and the second army out in the wings. Doublechess games are rich with tactics and have the 'feel' of orthodox chess.' -- David Short.
I have added DoubleChess to the poll because: 1. Lack of variants being nominated, 2. The inventor gave evidence that the game is being widely played, and 3. We now have a good way to ensure a fair vote. So, in essence, I have 'nominated' the game by placing it in the poll. If you still have objections, we can take it up in the CVP Editors group.
Extinction Chess is already a Recognized Variant, so I will not be including it in the poll. Drop Chess, while being a widely known variant, has been improved upon (IMHO) by Hostage Chess. Since the variants are so similar, my thought is to stick with Hostage Chess. Alice Chess is a good suggestion and I will add it to the poll. And I think 5 entries for the poll is a good number, so I will still accept nominations, but they will be held over for the next poll after this one.
Here are the results of the poll: Variant Votes Percentage Tamerlane Chess 8 35% Crazyhouse 3 13% Hostage Chess 4 17% DoubleChess 1 4% Alice Chess 7 30% Total voters: 23 Next poll will include Alice, Crazyhouse and Hostage Chess. Other nominations will be accepted. I plan to start the next poll on August 1, 2003.
The (under review) guy was just some text to indicate that the comment was under review. I have since removed this text so it will just show up blank until the comment is reviewed. Stay tuned -- I'll probably be making small changes here and there as people get comfortable with the semi-moderated system.
I dropped the ball on that one. We have $25 from the entrance fees, and I'll pony up another $75. That makes $100 in prize money. Mike Howe, the 1st place winner will receive $70, John Lawson, the second place winner will receive $30. Both will receive award certificates. I apologize for dropping the ball on this. Hopefully my lack of action on this issue won't discourage others from joining in on other tournaments.
You're right Mike, I forgot to take into account the triple repetition rule. :( But other than that, it is (as far as I can see) a perfect defense, even against a stronger force. I can see the wisdom of having the triple repetition be a loss instead of a draw. Well, anyway, I really do like this game -- the limited archer which requires a spotter works really well and the pieces in general interact well with each other. I especially like that the immobilizer has been weakened by having more pieces which are effective against it.
Hi Paul, I would think the book is fairly valuable. I would be willing to pay on the order of $200 for it, but you may be able to get much more than that depending on the book's condition.
Since this comment is for a page that has not been published yet, you must be signed in to read it.
I'm almost ready with an initial version of user posted pages. This capability will appear probably in another day or two. It will be very simple at first, and then I'll add capabilities as the system is used and suggestions are made. So just keep in mind -- it's a work in progress.
Dave, try sending the email from http://www.chessvariants.org/contests/10/index.html Our .com address is older and not used as much any more.
Mark, just check the 'Using HTML tags in the text below' checkbox at the top of the page for editing the description of your submission. But be sure to add paragraph and pre tags where appropriate in your textual descriptions. When the 'Using HTML tags in the text below' checkbox is unchecked, I add PRE tags around each text section, and chop the text up into reasonably short lines (so they don't run off the right side of the page).
I've added a 'Lock' feature, which should prevent a particular page from being edited. All member submitted pages that are in the 10 contest are now locked in this way. Clarifications or corrections to a page can be added as comments.
Fergus, there's a link to review member submitted pages on the Editors' Page.
Charles, To create multiple links to the same page, just view the page in question, and at the bottom/left of the page should be a set of links that look like this: [info] [edit] [link] Click on the rightmost one (ie. [link]). This will being up a form which will allow you to add more links to that page. Let me know if you have any questions.
The site is back up, although not everything is working. Please be patient with us over the next week or so as we fix up our site-move related problems. Thanks!
Yes, I have, for the time being, removed the code that gets executed at the bottom of each page, so comments and 'see also' sections will not be displayed. You can use the 'More Information' link at the top of the page to see comments and 'see also' information. I will be bringing back this functionality gradually, so that we can control our resource usage on our host server.
I wanted to let everyone know the developemnt of the series has been delayed due to the death of my 17 year old son in aug. 2004, he was in an automobile accident. He was helping me write the series (we had come up with over seventy different battlefields at that time). His death was a shock to me and those I was working with at Strategy First, we were under the gun for a november 2004 deadline on a third party developent aggreement, I'm sorry for those who were waiting, I couldn't cocentrate, I now plan on developing the games myself and dedicating the series to the memory of my son Philip. I'm looking for programmers and artist as well as a ai program. Christine, your comments attracted my atention please email me at [the email address specified on my information page].
There is no need to log in. You are prompted for your user id and/or password when they are required. Since you already have a user id and password, I think you're all set. We do not employ any 'IP verification'. Your user id and password are prompted for each time you try to do something that requires verification of your identity. I hope this helps you to understand how our system works. If not, please do ask more questions. Thanks.
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displayperson.php?personid=matthew_montchal
Michael, Just go to the 'upload files' link on your page, and upload your graphic. After your graphic is uploaded, you will be shown some html code to add to your page to make your graphic show up. Let me know if you run into any problems. Upload file link for your page: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/memberupload.php?itemid=MSnovachess100
As far as letting other people use my code for the commenting system -- I certainly have no objection. I shall work on packaging the code and documenting how to use it. Perhaps I shall even clean it up and make it more generic. However, that is all in my spare time, of which, I seem to have less and less these days.
My apologies to all the people I haven't gotten back to. Believe me, I still intend to get back to you all. Perhaps over the holidays! ;-)
As far as letting other people use my code for the commenting system -- I certainly have no objection. I shall work on packaging the code and documenting how to use it. Perhaps I shall even clean it up and make it more generic. However, that is all in my spare time, of which, I seem to have less and less these days.
My apologies to all the people I haven't gotten back to. Believe me, I still intend to get back to you all. Perhaps over the holidays! ;-)
In any case, it seems obvious to me that you feel slighted, and that's unfortunate. Please have patience with we mere mortals. We do try...
You can reference the file you uploaded using the following URL:
../membergraphics/MSnovachess100/NovaChess100Release.zip
The other option is to create your own Zillions page for Nova Chess 100, and then we can link the two pages (the game page and the zillions page) together using the indexing system.
I never met him personally, but we corresponded via postal mail while he was in the process of compiling new entries for the next version of the ECV.
Perhaps it makes sense for our site to have recognized people in addition to variants? If so, David Pritchard would certainly be on that list.
Subject-based comments were not being blocked. However they should be now.
How about: 0 Poor 1 Below average 2 Average 3 Good 4 Excellent As with any rating system, it will only be as good as the quality of its inputs. If people are generally thoughtful, honest and objective, then I think the system will work well. As others have said, the more valuable input is the more qualitative vs. the quantitative, although quantitative input can have some value that qualitative input does not have. So the more ways we give people to give feedback, the better. I do hope that people will avoid abusing the system for personal gain. Such acts decrease the value of the system overall and are damaging in the long-term.
>> 4. not sure about this, but maybe another idea for a game could be 'bizzare' ... of course 'bizzare' games can be completely serious, still, it could be an idea.
Another possible system might involve awarding points over time (everyone gets N points every M days). The points would be of the 'use it or lose it' type, so that point hording would not be possible.
Or perhaps a 'free market' system, where each rater starts out with N points, which the rater uses to 'buy' the right to rate a particular entry from the entry's owner. Eg. Dave has 10 points. He buys the right to rate Peter's Anti-King Chess, which Peter is selling for 3 points. Dave now has 7 points left, and Peter has 13 (assuming he had 10 before the transaction).
The down side to these schemes is that they discourage free expression by putting certain artificial limits on expression.
Hi Joe, >> Next, how do I sign up? Go to any of your game pages (the quickest way to do that is to go to your information page, and click on the 'Items this person invented' link. Any of the items under the 'Game' section can be submitted for entry in the rating system. Just display the web page for the game you want to submit, and you'll see near the bottom, right above the author/inventor line, a link to 'Submit this game to be available for rating!'. Click on that link and follow the instructions. You have 7 games you invented, so it shouldn't be too much of an effort for you to submit them individually. I just hope Ralph Betza doesn't try to submit all his! ;-) Note that only GAME pages may be submitted for rating. If you have a game courier or zillions item that you want to submit, just create a game page for it first, and then submit the game page. I am limiting ratings to game pages to avoid one person rating game X's zillions page, while another person rates game X's game courier preset and yet another person rates game X's game information page. All for now. Please continue with the feedback, and thank you for the kind words. My experience tells me I will be making lots of changes to this system, so don't be shy about suggestions.
'...Of myself forever reproaching myself, (for who more foolish than I, and who more faithless?)...'
Fergus, I cleaned it up. Editors: please do not categorize a variant of chess as 'chess'. The 'chess' category is reserved for FIDE chess information only. There are other categories for slight variations on FIDE chess (ie. the chess variants using standard FIDE chess equipment categories).
Many thanks also to our volunteers, which includes our entire staff. Being a volunteer here is a practically thankless job (except perhaps once a year!), but we do find it rewarding to be able to support this site, and help foster an interest in chess variants all over the world.
I have created a Chess Variants Wiki, as a test to see if it would make sense to have a 'sister' site that would be more collaborative in nature. Any one interested should go to: http://chessvariants.wikidot.com/ This will be a learning process for me, as I am not familiar with administrating or building Wikis. My impression is that the Wiki community itself does most of the work. Is that right? ;-)
Thanks Joe. I hadn't realized I had to approve new members. I've set up the site so that a password can be used so that new members can avoid waiting for me to approve them. The password is cvp2007 The proposed chessvariants wiki is at: http://chessvariants.wikidot.com/ It is not intended to replace chessvariants.org, nor is it intended to replace the chess variants section of the wikipedia. 3 people have joined up so far, but couldn't do anything because I hadn't approved them.
ð
Anyway, it was expanded into an HTML entity character sequence, which my script doesn't handle well. Sorry about that.
'For any other piece [than a knight] to make a non-capturing move two spaces, it costs 3 points.' I don't think that's true. Rather, it is true for pawns and kings, but for a queen, bishop or rook, it would cost 2 points (1 point to move through the first square, and 1 point to move into the destination square). Jeremy, if you could point out which rules have lead you to believe the statements you made, I would appreciate it. I'll want to modify them to be more clear. Thanks!
If you post it as a game, I'll change it to an article.
Once you finished registering, you should be able to post your own games.
I've been thinking lately that we should expand our 'recognized variants' system to include people and software. As an editor, I will refrain from making suggestions, but if enough of our readers feel a particular person or program deserves recognition, please post something under this subject. Thanks!
100 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.