Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Aurelian Florea wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2018 08:05 PM UTC:

Hi Kevin,

About the topology I agree with you with the same train of thought actually, with the reserve that I would not consider much circular boards, unless as a niche. I would consider though boards akin to Balbo's. But it seems to me that almost no one else does :)!

Also rooks and bishops should probably be the backbone of all "nextchesses". Some larger one could even have four each or 4 bishops (they probably have to be evened numbered as they are color bound) and 3 rooks. The later is a bit uncomfortable to me.

Probably 12x10 is the largest possible next step, but then we could have the nextnextchess, and so on. Who know where future technology will, if ever, limit us.

I think that an initial piece density of around 50% is desirable even if I tend to go a bit over when inventing :)!

Bigger games means longer games. We should all accept that.

On a 12x10 game, pawns starting on the 3rd rank are almost a must unless you use gating (as in Musketeer chess), or some similar technique. JL Cazeaux uses pawns that may always move twice in his larger boards. That one is a great idea :)!

Even trades of different pieces should definitely be a goal. My apothecary series has such a goal. Although having multiple levels of such trades is quite interesting 2 (like Q and unicorn- BNN- on first level, the griffin is out there on larger boards, too).

Games with drops should have weaker pieces by default, but they do have their own special flavor. I'm aiming for my apothecary shogi games to introduce multiple levels of promotion so staying on the board is encouraged :)!

About AI, I agree unless we become cyborgs or something.

 

So the only thing I'd like to add is that there is no reason to have a sole next chess. I had said before that I find Grand Chess and Omega Chess as good candidates who should not exclude each other. Also different armies games have special flavour but they are extremelly difficult to desing, as they add a balanced armies requirement. Also once there why Stop at that level? If say 3 12x10 games become very popular why not improve them into 18x14 games for example or 16x16?


Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.