You are on the backup site for Chessvariants.com. Any posts, moves, or other changes you make here will not be permanent, because the pages and database from the main site will be backed up here every midnight EST. Additionally, things may not be working right, because this site is also a testbed for newer system software. So, if you are not here to test, develop, or merely read this site, you may want to change .org to .com in the navigation bar and go to the main site.



The Chess Variant Pages



This page is written by the game's inventor, Ken Regan.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Ken Regan wrote on 2010-05-13 UTC
Gene M., sorry I missed your excellent queries long ago.  The main benefit
is removing the randomness, and (I believe) improving Black's chances for
dynamic play.  The initial phase favors Black insofar as White must commit
first.  If Black needs to win in the last round or game of a match, he/she
can place his King on the opposite wing, etc.  I think it is harder to
deaden the game.  I see parts of similar arguments for Chess960 in the
selection from your book on your site.

You are right---my description omits the important detail that White begins
by placing 1 piece on the back row, then Black, then White..., as Bronstein
originally provided.  Move 8 is forced for each side, hence my joke about
it.  Your comment quoting Kramnik on corner bishops is especially
interesting.  I can add to my previous conversation with M. Winther (I
think this part was in private e-mail) that chess programs, at least the
ones I've tried which accept arbitrary starting positions, agree with
Kramnik in their evaluations.  However, one can also reply to Kramnik that
a corner Bishop is already 'developed'!---and go back to my original
point about recorded human tendencies.

I've heard anecdotally that a fair number of the symmetrical Chess960
setups are considered to magnify White's advantage of the first move,
enough that GM X was uncomfortable playing them.  Do you have stats on
White's win rate?  Of course it's possible that 'my' (really
Bronstein+Fischer's) variant would center on far fewer than 960 preferred
setups between both players, negating the hoped-for compounding by tens of
thousands.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Baseline chess with Fischer rules

Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.