Check out Alice Chess, our featured variant for June, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Anonymous wrote on Fri, Mar 12, 2010 09:49 AM UTC:
It's me, who written coment that this game didn't deserve it's name.

Ok,  maybe i am not right, but i still think that game must have some piece
wich is used only in Shogi. Or at least add promotion of some pieces other
than pawns (at least, promoting piece like Sage to Dragon Horse). It will
make Shogi feeling a bit higer (there are nothing in this game wich is only
from Shogi).

About boat: sorry, i made mistake: boat had same move as alfil, i forgot
it.
You can read read about Bulgarian chess here:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MLbolyarchess
This game is not as known as Shatar, Grande Acedrex, Tafl and others, so i
will not approv if someone decide to make 'Eurasian chess' with pieces
from it, i just liked Bulgarian chess and i am sad that it's not
well-known, that's why i have mentioned then.

So, maybe this game really deserves it's name (almost), but it's still
good idea to make game with pieces from several different hystorical games.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Eurasian Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.