Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 07:40 PM UTC:
| Pruning techniques are commonly based on calculated values of the 
| piece movements. But what if these values are 'outside' the movement?

It seems your thinking is badly influenced by Zillions, which indeed seems to derive values of the pieces from their mobilities. It must, because it does not have any prior knowledge of the value of the pieces. When I write a dedicated program for a certain game, though, I measure the value of the involved pieces through asymmetric play-testing, and then program these values in 'by hand'. 

| For example: The Drone would be calculated at an extremely low value 
| since its immediate movement does not result in the loss of material 
| for the opponent. But it has another value which does not present 
| itself until later in the game. Without a Drone, a player cannot 
| promote a Highborn and thus risks losing the production phase of the 
| turn.

If having an extra Drone is as good as having 5 extra Soldiers, for whatever reason, the play-testing will reveal that. And I would simply award that score for the Drone being on the board, even if a Drone were a piece thas no moves at all.

These are not properties that make a game difficult for a computer to play. It might be difficult to acquire the knowledge that need to go in such a program, and it is unlikely that the program will be able to derive deep strategic motives in a few seconds with no other information than the rules. It takes thousands of high-quality Capablanca Chess games to derive a value for Archbishop and Chancellor. But it is not realistic to require that a program has to discover that knowledge for itself within a single game. If we teach people how to play Chess, we do tell them the piece values, even though they are not part of the rules at all.

Edit Form

Comment on the page HiveQueen

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.