You are on the backup site for Chessvariants.com. Any posts, moves, or other changes you make here will not be permanent, because the pages and database from the main site will be backed up here every midnight EST. Additionally, things may not be working right, because this site is also a testbed for newer system software. So, if you are not here to test, develop, or merely read this site, you may want to change .org to .com in the navigation bar and go to the main site.

twixter wrote on 2007-11-11 UTC
```Rotary is based on Ploy, and constitutes an improvement over that game IMO.
I suspect that computers may solve Ploy some day, finding a specific
opening repertoire with smashing attacks. I believe Ploy is more
imbalanced than chess, although it hardly matters for casual play. Rotary
is much deeper and better balanced, and involves long-range planning and
strategical concepts which chess players can latch onto.

If you have a Ploy set and an extra set of pieces, you can add Rotary to
your box. You could grind down the direction pointers on 18 pieces to make
the pawns, and add a circular disk on the back to indicate a promoted pawn.
A photo of such a set is at http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/267282

One nice feature of Rotary is that draws cannot happen due to insufficient
material. If just the two kings remain on the board, one will always be
able to force checkmate on the other! It's an interesting puzzle to solve
this 2-piece endgame. My solution, presented without proof, is at
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/237991 scroll down a bit for the
solution.

Here are the rules for this 2-piece endgame: The board is a square 9x9
grid. Each king is a circular disc with pointers in four directions, which
looks like an X or like a + depending on how it is oriented. A move
consists of either rotating without moving, or moving one space in an
indicated direction followed by optionally rotating. The only way to
rotate is to change from X to + or vice versa. You may not pass.```

Edit Form

Comment on the page Rotary

## Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

# Top level header: `<H1>`

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same `<U>HTML code</U>` enclosed by backticks.

## Secondary Header: `<H2>`

• Unordered list item
• Second unordered list item
• New unordered list
• Nested list item
• An URL by itself:

### Third Level header `<H3>`

1. An ordered list item.
2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
3. A third ordered list item.

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags `<DL>`, `<DT>` and `<DD>`.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.
﻿