Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Mating potential and piece values[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
Jeremy Lennert wrote on Thu, Sep 27, 2012 04:31 PM UTC:
You might also consider repeating your experiment of adding mating
potential to a bishop.

Another consideration:  does the value of mating potential depend
significantly on how many other pieces already have it?  If you replaced
rooks on both sides with a similarly-valued but non-mating piece, does the
value of commoners relative to knights go up?  If you replaced the bishops
on both sides with a similarly-valued piece with mating potential, does it
go down?  I think Betza suggested once that it was important for a side to
have a piece with mating potential, but not so important how many pieces
had it.