Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Gary Gifford wrote on Sun, Apr 4, 2004 01:11 PM UTC:
I dedicate this comment respectfully to Dr. Suess, for reasons which will soon become clear. I started to write this as an e-mail response to a player/inventor who suggested that I make changes to S.P.C. But I feel it will do more good here, as a comment for all interested to see. Because of the story associated with Shanghai Palace Chess, i.e., that of a wise man teaching three students a lesson so that they will better respect Chess, Shogi, and Xianqi, I feel that I must really leave it as it is. If it is not liked, then that perhaps is its purpose, to put more focus on the other three games. To change the Western, Chinese, or Shogi elements further would destroy the entire concept... would make the wise man's lesson meaningless. I know that the game is quite playable. And for the game tester and me it was quite fun. Enough so that we put Shogi and Xianqi aside for 2 months and played Shanghai Palace Chess face-to-face (on a real board) for 2 months before I submitted the game. To glance at it and think about it for a few minutes and then refer to it as a monster or a chaotic mess [in contrast to playing 20 or so games of it]well there is certainly a big difference regarding the basis of perception... sort of like reading a movie review and commenting, as opposed to actually going out to see the movie. I think Doctor Suess would see the negative comments regarding S.P.C. as the 'Green Eggs and Ham' syndrome. Would you play it on a train? Would you play it in the rain? I would not play it on a train. I would not play it in the rain. I do not like Shanghai Chess. I do not like it, I must confess. ,,,, Anyway, I think that about sums it up.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Shanghai Palace Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.