Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Bob Greenwade wrote on Fri, Dec 8, 2023 03:34 PM UTC in reply to Joe Joyce from 09:40 AM:

Apologies, Bob, for dragging other designers' 4D games onto your page. But 4D variants are an interesting topic, with little available information, and both Ben R. and I are interested in 4D variants and we've each done at least one. Grin, I see that unlike me, you were not aiming for extreme playability.

No apologies necessary; it's a valid topic here.

The difference between this variant and other 4DVs is (as Fergus pointed out) that this one doesn't use 4D movement; it's the usual 2D movement, on the surface of the tesseract. That affects the playability to an extent, though as I've been arranging things I'm starting to see that it might actually be playable after all, if one doesn't mind using a 3D setup (which I think some 4D games do anyway).

Still, it's easier to lay out 256 squares for a 4x4x4x4 game than 504 squares (not counting the corners) for a 24x5x5 game, and that's not even considering the complex relationships of each side to its neighbors. I've tried to simplify the latter aspect, and I'm in the process of doing so further until it's easy enough for neurotypicals* to understand.

Even forcing it to slide 2+1 or 1+2 without the leap still means the knight has 2 paths to its target square.

If you change the move to [W-F] (one orthogonal followed by one diagonal) that would reduce it further.

*My apologies if that comes across as condescending.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Chess on a Tesseract

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.