Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
M Winther wrote on Tue, Jan 8, 2013 10:09 AM UTC:
The reason why the Capablanca big-board variants haven't caught on is
because the board alters the relation between pieces. There are now ten
pawn, a fact which affects the pawn value. The center of the board isn't
sharply defined anymore. The knight is worth a pawn less than a bishop. The
rook is now worth equally much as a bishop + knight. There is now plenty of
space on the board, so one is unlikely to achieve spatial advantage. 

All this means that important strategical themes are lost, especially the
important relation between knight and bishop, and it's hardly possible to
sacrifice a rook for a knight anymore.

However, the Gustavian board retains all the relations of Fide chess. There
are only eight pawns, and the relation between knight and bishop is
retained. Possibly, the knight value increases slightly because of the
extra corner square, which makes it easier to maneuver with the knight. The
queen is probably somewhat more valuable since it can now invade the enemy
position via the extra corner square. 

I hold that the 68-squared Gustavian board is much superior to the
90-squared board, although it also depends on the rules of the game. However, if
we simply add the chancellor and the archbishop to the Gustavian board, we
get a much better game than Capablanca Chess or Gothic Chess. This is
because all the fine nuances of Fide-chess are retained. 
http://hem.passagen.se/melki9/gustaviii.htm
/M. Winther

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.