Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Joe Joyce wrote on Sat, Aug 14, 2010 10:39 AM UTC:
Let me use Ralph Betza's own words on knight vs commoner to bolster my observations on values of the two pieces: 'Well, no; in 1991, when the above was written, I thought that a non-royal King was worth less than a Knight, but in 1994 I discovered that the King is worth more IF you know the right strategy to take advantage of its strengths!!! A very important lesson!'

I've designed a number of games using both commoner and knight. [I also, on those very rare occasions when I play FIDE, tend to not castle; instead using the king as a support piece in attacks, on the theory that I'm not very good and need all the power I can get.] Interestingly, against human opponents, I am rather difficult to beat, but Zillions has disposed of me easily, by playing a helter-skelter style.  I've actually never beaten Zillions, but I have won against people who beat Zillions. Style is important to how people play. Style doesn't affect the ideal value or the actual practical value, but it does affect the perceived value. And thus, circularly, affects peoples' styles. This, at least, was what Ralph was talking about.

Clearly, the values of the pieces are related to the task they have. If you change the task sufficiently, the values logically should change along with it. Let me give 2 examples. The first is chess as a race. Keep all rules the same except for the winning condition. The king becomes demoted to an ordinary piece. You win the game by being the first to place any of your pieces or pawns on the opponent's back rank. Do the pieces now maintain their values?

The second example is Chieftain Chess. This large variant has 32 pieces/side on a 12x16 board. There are 4 knights and 12 guards per side. There are also 4 short range [3 square] bishop-like and rook-like pieces per side. Finally, there are 4 'kings' each, which move 1 or 2 squares: 1 square any, then the next any, except back to the original. Move as many pieces as you have kings per turn. Win by capturing all the opponent's kings. In this game, I believe commoners are more valuable than knights, specifically because they can interdict enemy kings.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Knightmate

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.