Enter Your Reply

Thanks again. NextChess, unlike -2,-3...-8, overflowed 25 comments,
in fact 100 comments by mistake. These are what Joe said there, showing consistency,
to help kick them. They are easier to retrieve directly here than arduous
link for over-25 comments:
(1) http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=20582,
(2) http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=20591,
(3) http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=20630. In (1) Joe's 9x8 for Modern is infrequent but occurs in Eight-Stone(#18) and in Not Particularly New, #28 Next Chess soon to be up-slotted. Templar is also 72 squares but 10x8. They all enter at the bottom, and that is their number for interim. So like Time Travel now is #29 but likely to become upper half in all its ramifications once evaluated and up-slotted. On boards, singled out in rough order so far might be 8x10, 10x10, 68 and 72 squares in variable shapes, 9x9, 64 squares (too small). Those latter two under consideration were increasingly alarming and untenable solutions as Track One. Who knows but that Sissa(#7) on 8x8 may improve to 8x10 etc.
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=25116