Enter Your Reply

But wait. Historic cultural-rooted CVs actually become fully mathematical under state-of-the-art tooling and treatment -- because they are one-of-a-kind amidst all-purpose math. (As for
example the bogus Shroud of Turin submits to scientific analysis as hardly
over half a millennium old.) Look at OrthoChess herself under the
microscope 100 years now. Before lab testing, ask is the purportedly offered-up ''new CV'' satire? Self-satire? Art or nouveau art? Scientific or subjective tongue-in-cheek? Hostile (to what) or benign? Answer (usually): none of the above. Instead they are to be taken until proven otherwise quasi-artistic self-expression out of the blue. What means but statistico-mathematical to find the rare exceptions? Under scrutiny most CVs in this day could likely turn out to be ham-handed sham products irreverent to origins or direction for the future. Opinion pieces, period pieces many overridden by themes in an excuse. Where is anymore the Sport Chess was intended rather than all Art? Where are the contests of only a decade ago? Unmitigated projection. The effluent society. Conclusion: terminal addiction. Follow-up: Chess, as science and sport both, should stand above every other ''game'': Chatter and scatter, or helter skelter, or pick-up sticks. And not really be subject to comparison at all. It's about like comparing one electric light bulb with a solar flare.