[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Chess Variant Pages Rating System. Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]It does seem that this rating system has been little used. The highest rated game has remained the same for the longest time, and it has been rated only twice. The two main problems with it right now are visibility and competition. The link to rate a game appears near the bottom of the page. Meanwhile, there is a link at the top of each game page for rating the page. People who want to rate a game usually use the top link, which is for entering a comment and a brief rating. With two systems in place for rating games, people are favoring the one that is more visible and easier to use. David, if you want people to use this system instead, my recommendation is to (1) make it more visible and (2) use only a single rating system. Either remove ratings from comments or integrate this system into the comment system.
This system seems much too tedious. How about having numerical ratings in the comments and a rankings page based on that? Perhaps editors can review ratings for being official or not, having the same requirements as this system.
This idea is good in general, but your category system strikes me as weak. Your four categories other than 'Overall' do not, between them, get at what is most important about a game. How well the variant achieves its stated goals? Whether that's even a good thing depends on the goals. The number and quality of novel concepts introduced in the variant? I don't think I'm alone in believing that a large number of good chess variants -- probably easily a majority -- rank relatively low in this category, while many bad ones rank very high. It seems to me that the main thing is PLAYABILITY. 'Aesthetic appeal' has something to do with playability, but doesn't really cover it. And then 'Presentation' is just the web page. I can easily imagine disliking a chess variant and yet ranking it equal or higher in each of these categories to a game I really liked.
💡📝David Howe wrote on Fri, Jun 23, 2006 05:37 AM UTC:Hi Joe, >> Next, how do I sign up? Go to any of your game pages (the quickest way to do that is to go to your information page, and click on the 'Items this person invented' link. Any of the items under the 'Game' section can be submitted for entry in the rating system. Just display the web page for the game you want to submit, and you'll see near the bottom, right above the author/inventor line, a link to 'Submit this game to be available for rating!'. Click on that link and follow the instructions. You have 7 games you invented, so it shouldn't be too much of an effort for you to submit them individually. I just hope Ralph Betza doesn't try to submit all his! ;-) Note that only GAME pages may be submitted for rating. If you have a game courier or zillions item that you want to submit, just create a game page for it first, and then submit the game page. I am limiting ratings to game pages to avoid one person rating game X's zillions page, while another person rates game X's game courier preset and yet another person rates game X's game information page. All for now. Please continue with the feedback, and thank you for the kind words. My experience tells me I will be making lots of changes to this system, so don't be shy about suggestions.
5 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.