Suffice it to say I disagree with most of that but debating it is not a good use of my time. The time to debate the merits was when this came up, but instead you just did what you wanted.
Really, this is the least of it. Your XBetza has become so insanely complicated that most of it is of no use to me. There is absolutely no chance that I could implement it in a bug-free way, and some of it I don't even understand.
Fortunately, all I need to do is parse those strings that represent moves that ChessV's internal move generator is capable of anyway, and it does that with a clean subset of the grammar.
Suffice it to say I disagree with most of that but debating it is not a good use of my time. The time to debate the merits was when this came up, but instead you just did what you wanted.
Really, this is the least of it. Your XBetza has become so insanely complicated that most of it is of no use to me. There is absolutely no chance that I could implement it in a bug-free way, and some of it I don't even understand.
Fortunately, all I need to do is parse those strings that represent moves that ChessV's internal move generator is capable of anyway, and it does that with a clean subset of the grammar.