You are on the backup site for Chessvariants.com. Any posts, moves, or other changes you make here will not be permanent, because the pages and database from the main site will be backed up here every midnight EST. Additionally, things may not be working right, because this site is also a testbed for newer system software. So, if you are not here to test, develop, or merely read this site, you may want to change .org to .com in the navigation bar and go to the main site.



The Chess Variant Pages




[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Kamikaze III. If the lone queen checks, she wins.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
J. Gryphon wrote on 2011-10-12 UTC
The key difference between this variant and Maharaja and the Sepoys is that
the Maharaja need only check the King -- not checkmate it -- to win the
game, and it doesn't matter if it puts itself into danger doing so.
Because of this, the Kamikaze Queen is much more powerful than the Q+K
compound.

Now, I'm not anywhere near a master Chess player, but I played it against
myself a few times. Most of the White openings I've seen are Fool's Mates
that open the King up to be checked in one or two turns, thus losing the
game.

I suspect that Red is intended to be played by a very weak player; with
strong players I expect the kamikaze should have a major advantage, though
with some deep level of perfect play, I suppose it might be possible for
White to win, but I haven't seen anything like that yet myself. If anyone
can prove that Red doesn't have a forced win, that'd be much
appreciated.

I think it's really more of a puzzle than a game, in any case.