Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
Reinhard Scharnagl wrote on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 09:33 AM UTC:
Hi Mats, yes, I handled the Mammoth as a fully jumping piece. Your
arguments whether the piece is not save towards distant threats is a
TACTICAL argument, which has nothing to do in average piece value
considerations. Be aware, that a Mammoth also has the chance to escape
such threats by his numerous move possibilities. And - as already earlier
stated - real exchanges would have to consider the actual positional
implications of all pieces within the actual board situation.

P.S.: I should mention again, that my scheme is calculating AVERAGE piece
values, which have to be completed by positional detail evaluations when
evaluating real board positions.

P.P.S.: See also at http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/schachveri1_e.html