Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sat, Oct 12, 2013 07:35 PM UTC:
> That implies it might _not_ be a good rule for chess _variants_, even if
it works out in orthodox chess--would that be your conclusion?

That depends entirely on the variant. In Chu Shogi stalemate is a win. But
with forwardly capturing Shogi Pawns you can never stop promotion anyway,
even with the aid of stalemate. (OTOH +P = Gold has no mating potential on 12x12 anyway!) As soon as you have a FIDE King and
Shatranj Pawns that promote to a piece with mating potential, KPK is much
more interesting with stalemate. And many variants have that..

> how often does the stalemate rule really alter your decision to resign? 

Well, even when badly behind, I certainly would not resign if the opponent
had the wrong color Bishop for his Rook Pawn. I can afford sacrifice myself
down to -4, and still have a draw. You smell the draw, as it were. Even more
so when he has two Knights. Even with just K+R against his K+2N+2P
(nominally 3-4 Pawns behind, as N=3.25, and advanced connected passers
might get a huge bonus, sacrificing my Rook for his two remaining Pawns
will give me an easy draw. Which I would not have without stalemate. Normally being 3 Pawns behind and no Pawns yourself is a pretty good reason for resigning!

Note that no pair of two equal simple (= Betza atomic) leapers has mating
potential against a FIDE King. So situations of this kind are actually
quite universal across Chess variants.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.