Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Tue, May 21, 2013 08:09 AM UTC:
True, the immense power of the Lion could be a concern. In Chu it is worth
over 1.5 Queen, which would put it around 15 pawn units. (Even without the
double-capture power, a WFDAN leaper would be worth about 11 pawns in a
FIDE context.) Perhaps it is indeed a bad idea to use the Lion as Queen
replacement, because that leaves only a Rook as second-strongest piece, and
thus virtually no possibility to trade the Lion for other pieces.

With Queens, there is at least the possibility to trade L for Q+R. One
possibility would be to replace a Knight with a Lion, rather than a Queen
(e.g. on b1/b8). The downside is that this would make an extremely large
'power density' on a relatively small board. (Not worse than Seirawan
Chess, however.)

I don't want to introduce any other unorthodox pieces, and certainly not
upgrade them, as this would create even more power density. All FIDE pieces
(except K and P) can already attack a Lion from a safe distance (i.e.
without exposing themselves to hit-and-run captures).

Perhaps a better design would be to switch to a 9x8 board, with a setup
similar to Angel Chess, replacing the Angel (worth about 13 pawns) by a
Lion. Non-standard boards tend to strongly decrease the willingness of
people to play a variant, however. That would also be an argument against
using 10x8, replacing C and A from Capablanca Chess by L and an extra N.
(To keep the power-density low: L+N ~ C+A, value-wise.)

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.