Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Joe Joyce wrote on Tue, Aug 14, 2012 05:51 AM UTC:
Hey, HG, thought I'd said that if I get a little help from a family member
or two, I'd try to run FairyMax for a while to generate some numbers, but
I didn't notice it when I scanned the thread. So I'll try to get some
numbers run. I agree Great Shatranj is a reasonable test case [thought I'd
said that, too :) ] and should show some effects - even if the leaping
ability counteracts the shorter range a bit. GtS often features re-grouping
turns, a few turns spent shuffling pieces around to get some attacking
weight together. Shouldn't that feature tend to blur out first turn ad?

Jeremy, 10 meters is a lot in the 100, but not so much in the 1000, and
little enough in the 10,000 that it's almost a fair start. As for turn
lengths, GtS goes around 50 moves, iirc, but that's very rough. Chieftain
runs around 35; 40 to the bitter end. The latest versions, the Warlord
games, seem run shorter, ~25ish turns for Clash of Arms. But at 4
pieces/turn, each player is making 100 - 150 moves [at least] in a game to
get a decision. As for number of pieces, all the Chief variants discussed
here have 32 +/-2 pieces, on boards that range from 10x12 through Chief's
12x16 to 12x20 for the free, hidden set-up Warlord: A Test of Wills. No
Chief variant discussed here has pieces that move more than 3 squares; none
of the variants has any piece moving more than 4. The average move in all
variants is under 2 squares.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.