You are on the backup site for Chessvariants.com. Any posts, moves, or other changes you make here will not be permanent, because the pages and database from the main site will be backed up here every midnight EST. Additionally, things may not be working right, because this site is also a testbed for newer system software. So, if you are not here to test, develop, or merely read this site, you may want to change .org to .com in the navigation bar and go to the main site.



The Chess Variant Pages



Ubi-ubi chess

Ubi-ubi chess is an experimental chess variant, that came up in a discussion between Koen Versmissen and Dirk Borst at the house of Hans Bodlaender in January 1998.

The Ubi-ubi is a rather strong fairy chess piece, and we wondered how this piece would do in a chess variant. The first variant tried was dismissed as `not good' after a little experimentation - a correction was not tried anymore. I'm told that ubi-ubi means `everywhere' in Latin.

First variant

The game is played with a standard chess set, with in the setup the pawns on the d-column and f-column are advanced one square, and the knights are considered to be ubi-ubi's.

White:
King e1; Queen d1; Rook a1, h1; Ubi-ubi b1, g1; Bishop c1, f1; Pawn a2, b2, c2, d3, e2, f3, g2, h2.

Black:
King e8; Queen d8; Rook a8, h8; Ubi-ubi b8, g8; Bishop c8, f8; Pawn a7, b7, c7, d6, e7, f6, g7, h7.

Ubi-ubi's can make arbitrary (but not infinitely) many knight moves, but must stop their movement when they take a piece from the opponent.

Comments

Dirk Borst (white) played against Koen Versmissen the following short game: 1. Qd2, Qd7. 2. Qg5, Qc6. 3. Qh5+, resign.

Unfortunately, the game is flawed: after a little experimentation, it seems that the best white can do is to exchange all four ubi-ubi's, after which he has a better position in an otherwise further normal game of chess. If white does not exchange ubi-ubi's, then black should do so, while playing h3 is deadly for white.

Second variant

In the second (untried) variant, each player has only one ubi-ubi, but the player does not need to specify which of the two knights is an ubi-ubi. Only when a player makes a move with a knight/ubi-ubi piece that is not a normal knight move, then this determines which of the two is the ubi-ubi, and which is the knight. The game is again played from the same setup as the first variant.

Now exchanging knights/ubi-ubi's would be disadvantageous, as the player whose piece is taken would determine the other `knight' to be the ubi-ubi.


Written by Hans Bodlaender.
WWW page created: February 20, 1998.