Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later
Arktur. Two kings and randomized setup. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Anonymous wrote on Thu, Aug 8, 2002 01:37 PM UTC:
One clarification is needed. If you check one king, such that the only way for that King to get out of check, is to put the other King in check, is the game won? I assume the answer is yes.

Charles Gilman wrote on Fri, Apr 23, 2004 07:08 AM UTC:
My understanding of 'checkmate' is that no move is available taking the
PLAYER out of check. A move merely changing which of two Kings is in check
is not a move out of check. This is certainly implicit in my
two-rulers-aside games (Magna Carta, Sachsenschach, Unionschach, some
forms of Tunnelchess).
	Here's another question. The sample game has the Bishops on
opposite-colour squares. Is this a requirement?

Peter Riesen wrote on Wed, Dec 14, 2005 09:19 PM UTC:
The Bishops are placed on opposite-colored squares, like in Fischer Random Chess.

Ben Reiniger wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2022 02:12 PM UTC:

I don't understand the sample game in this page; quite possibly I'm missing something obvious. 7...Qxc6 balances material?


Thor Slavensky wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2022 01:05 PM UTC:

I guess that will lose the queen: 8. Qa5+, Qa6 9. Bxa6


🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Jan 7 11:57 PM UTC:

This is basically a random version of Homolateral Chess, except that it was invented earlier.


6 comments displayed

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.