Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest
84 Spaces Contest. 84 Spaces Contest begins![All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Tomas Forsman wrote on Wed, Sep 25, 2002 03:01 PM UTC:
How many are interested in meeting up to play some of the submissions every
now and then?
-=T=-

📝Hans Bodlaender wrote on Tue, Sep 24, 2002 11:16 AM UTC:
A few details: you can also now submit games that have not submitted before, just send everything before the end of November. The new contest rules can be read via the link at the top of this page.

Glenn Overby II wrote on Tue, Sep 24, 2002 12:43 AM UTC:
Doug, I did.  It's been resubmitted, so will probably be up soon.  Three
players, naturally.  :)

Doug Chatham wrote on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 03:54 PM UTC:
Did anybody get inspired to write an Orwellian _1984_-themed entry? Just curious.

📝Hans Bodlaender wrote on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 07:20 AM UTC:
The running of the contest will be taken over by me, with help of other editors of the Chess Variant Pages. Please resubmit your games again; they will be added soon. I also decided to extend the deadline for submitting games till November 30, 2002. <p> A change is also that we plan to have the contest decided by a qualified judge. Email us if you have questions about the contest.

🕸📝Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Sep 22, 2002 11:51 PM UTC:
David has been emailing me at my ZZN email account, and ZZN recently stopped POP3 use for free email accounts. So the email he was sending me was not being downloaded with Eudora. I finally read and replied to some of it tonight when I logged into this email account on the web.

David Howe wrote on Sun, Sep 22, 2002 05:02 PM UTC:
I have been attempting to contact Fergus, but it appears as if he is being completely unresponsive. Either that, or he isn't getting my emails. Consequently, we have decided that Hans will run the contest with the rest of the editors helping to publish the submissions. <p>Anyone who submitted an entry for the contest: <b>please resubmit your entry to our editors email address</b> (which can be found <a href='http://www.chessvariants.com/feedback.html'>here</a>). We will <b>only</b> be accepting entries that were submitted to Fergus by the contest's deadline date. <p>We apologize for the way this contest was handled and ask your continued patience while we play catch-up and get the contest back on track.

Mark Thompson wrote on Sun, Sep 22, 2002 04:39 PM UTC:
Can anyone at least give us a rough count? Are there about 10 entries, about 20, about 40? Maybe even an exact count?

Peter Aronson wrote on Sun, Sep 22, 2002 04:23 PM UTC:
We're working on it!

Tomas Forsman wrote on Sun, Sep 22, 2002 11:16 AM UTC:
I wish that someone else within chessvariants.com could take it upon
him(her)self to publish the games. Once that is done there ain't much work
with the contest for quite some time.
The rest of the site are very active and new material comes up every now
and then, I really whish part would be as active.
I understand Fergus, sometimes one just doesn't have the time, strenght´or
motivation to follow some things through and sometimes it's just plain
impossible. I just wish that someone could help him out.

-=Tomas=-

Mark Thompson wrote on Mon, Sep 16, 2002 10:51 PM UTC:
I agree. Any departure from the contest format would have to be unanimous.

William Overington wrote on Mon, Sep 16, 2002 06:58 AM UTC:
I write to respond to some of the comments made by Mark Thompson.

>I don't see why we'd need anyone's permission to post material we wrote
ourselves.

My thinking was that such publication, if done without permission, could
possibly lead to disqualification from the 84 Spaces Contest.

>Nor would posting it on Yahoo compromise our right to our work,
since Yahoo can't legally claim proprietary rights over material that
someone else composed.

My concern with the rules of Yahoo groups is that those rules, in the
Terms of Service document, state that posting grants an intellectual
property rights license to Yahoo.  The wording is complicated.  In the
event of my wishing to license some intellectual property rights of
something which I have invented to a manufacturer or to a magazine, I do
not wish to have the complication of licences to Yahoo being part of the
equation, so I will not post my ideas to a Yahoo group.

I am, however, entirely willing to post my entries in this forum if the
owners of the www.chessvariants.com website, who are holding the contest,
agree that all entrants may post their entries in this forum.

However, that is my own view.  It is entirely possible that some entrants
might feel that they do not wish to post their entry or entries anywhere
prior to their entry or entries being published by the organizer of the
competition.  Indeed, some of them might feel that such prior publication
of other entries would be unfair.  This is, I suggest, not a matter of a
majority of entrants deciding the issue, for even if a majority agree to
something I feel that it should not be done if that agreement would
violate the rights under the rules of the contest of even one person.

David Howe wrote on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 06:46 PM UTC:
I have emailed Fergus and did get a reply. Unfortunately, he cannot put much time at all into running the contest or even keeping contestants informed about his plans. So stay tuned, it may be that someone else will be running the contest.

Mark Thompson wrote on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 06:28 PM UTC:
Yahoo, here, whatever, I'm just anxious to read about the entries and play
them. I suggest another venue because (presumably) these pages would have
posted them by now if they were able to, and we don't know how long the
wait will be. 

I don't see why we'd need anyone's permission to post material we wrote
ourselves. Nor would posting it on Yahoo compromise our right to our work,
since Yahoo can't legally claim proprietary rights over material that
someone else composed. Copyright doesn't work like that. You can REGISTER
a copyright on someone else's work -- sure, the copyright office will be
glad to take your registration fee and put your material on file -- but if
the author can prove it's his work, your copyright would have no force.

William Overington wrote on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 10:53 AM UTC:
Two points.

Firstly, if, and only if, the organizers of the www.chessvariants.com
website agree to a work-around, I am generally agreeable to a work-around,
though subject to my second point.

Secondly, I am unwilling to post details of my two entries to a Yahoo
group as Yahoo groups have rules about intellectual property rights in
postings and what 'you' will be doing with your own intellectual property
rights in posting to a Yahoo group.  I am happy with the rules about
intellectual property rights as stated in the 84 Spaces Contest rules, but
I am certainly not going to post my entries to a Yahoo group.

I wonder why Yahoo groups is suggested at all.  Surely a thread on this
www.chessvariants.com website could be started.  As I feel that the
permission of the organizers of the www.chessvariants.com website should
be a necessary enabling permission of publishing our entries before the
official publication, if that permission were forthcoming then perhaps it
could be accompanied by a permission to post entries in posts to this
website.

Mark Thompson wrote on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 03:47 AM UTC:
I guess Fergus must be pretty busy, as he would be starting a teaching job, so I'm wondering about possible work-arounds. What would the other contestants say to this: could we all agree to a certain date, and on that date we each go to the Yahoo! Chess Variants group and post a message describing our entry. I suppose we could also upload ZRF's to the file-download section, if we have them (or even HTML's). That way we could all start evaluating the games, and get a headstart for that great day when they appear here.

David Howe wrote on Fri, Sep 6, 2002 02:15 PM UTC:
I have been attempting to contact Fergus, but so far I haven't had any response. I will continue trying, so stay tuned.

Doug Chatham wrote on Sun, Sep 1, 2002 10:55 AM UTC:
When will the competing entries be posted?

Mark Thompson wrote on Sat, Aug 17, 2002 12:50 PM UTC:
Fergus, can you tell us how many there are?

🕸📝Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Aug 12, 2002 01:50 PM UTC:
I started moving later than I expected I would, because of delays in the refurbishing of my new apartment. In the meantime, my nephew, Christopher Turner Duniho, was born August 2nd. This kept me preoccupied during the delay. Shortly after that, I began moving stuff into my new apartment while work was still being done on refurbishing it. It is now almost completely refurbished, and I expect to set up my computer desk and move over my computer soon. If there are no more delays in refurbishing the apartment, I should be doing that this evening. I hope to get all the entries up this week after I have my computer up in my new apartment.

Paul E. Newton wrote on Wed, Aug 7, 2002 02:08 PM UTC:
Even though no entries were posted, there was never any indication on the page that the contest itself was delayed or postponed. So I agree with Ben, allowing people to submit after the deadline would be unfair to those who have held to the deadline.

Peter Aronson wrote on Tue, Aug 6, 2002 08:25 PM UTC:
I have a slight concern that because nothing about the contest was being posted for so long, some people may have thought that the contest itself was on hold, and hence not sent in their entries. If that is the case, then it would, I think, be unfair to disallow them to submit those entries. <hr> As an aside, none of this affects me personally as I decided I've won enough contests here of late, and are only sending in non-competing entries.

Ben Good wrote on Tue, Aug 6, 2002 08:19 PM UTC:
I agree with Paul, the entry deadline and when they're posted by fergus afterwards are two completely unrelated issues. and if you're really interested in fairness, to say that extending the deadline for certain people can hardly be considered fair - people who submit later will simply gain extra time to playtest and improve their game, while those of us who made an extra effort to make the deadline may not have been looking at our game for the past week because we considered the deadline closed. my feeling is that if you can't come up with a chess variant in 7 months (the amount of time available to submit), then you can wait til next year's contest. i'm sure there'll be more coming.

Paul E. Newton wrote on Tue, Aug 6, 2002 08:09 PM UTC:
I (also an entrant) do not see how the entry deadline has anything to do with getting the entries posted. They are two separate issues altogether. I think we can all understand the difficulties that Fergus has been through (and is currently going through) and I don't think that anyone wants to place any additional pressure on him. If it were suggested that the period for evaluation, comment and judging be extended, based on the delays in getting the entries posted, so that we still have a six-month period for evaluation and voting prior to the final judging, now to me, that would make sense and perhaps take some pressure off of Fergus...

Glenn Overby II wrote on Tue, Aug 6, 2002 07:30 PM UTC:
Speaking as a fellow entrant: Given the unusual circumstances surrounding
the submission and posting process, I think Tony's request is more than
fair, and suggest that Fergus consider approving it.

25 comments displayed

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.