Enter Your Reply

This was suitable thread for prolificists to propound or explain, yet they did not at all but for one Joyce. I disagree with everything Jeremy says in starting ''Multiform'', suspended almost immediately, 19.August.2007,
except for his quote of Ralph Betza, italicized probably in Blue at the
end, at the start: ''In order to come up with something really new, you
have to know what's been done before.'' Jeremy Good also quotes actual
book, by Lippmann. In fact, ChessboardMath's next project, along with
separately studying '9x9's, may as well be a book 'The Chess Artist'
2003 by J.C. Hallman. The precedent will be the two books on the automaton
Turk we already reviewed. Jeremy's thread here has formulation of Chess
Variant Page two-track system, originally the accepted method of operation,  comparing it to
Badminton. To answer Joyce's question(easy to figure out, there being
only 4 comments), I consider 100 squares an automatic reject, because
increase of over 50% would be overwhelming -- admitting 100 to be round and
popular number, making Joyce's question appropriate. However, we cannot, and must not, force the board to fit requisite
criteria.