Check out Chess with Different Armies, our featured variant for July, 2024.

This page is written by the game's inventor, Hans Bodlaender.

Not a Dodgson System Chess

Many people know the stories of Alice in Wonderland, written by Lewis Carroll. Fewer people know that Carroll was a mathematician. His real name was Charles Dodgson. In 1876, Dodgson proposed a system for selecting the winner in an election. See a scientific paper analysing this system.

As people that follow modern politics will be aware of, many election systems do not guarantee that the winner of the elections is indeed also preferred by the majority of the voters. For instance, if there are three candidates, lets call them A, B, C, who are supported by respectively 46, 45, and 9 percent of the voters, but the voters in favor of C prefer B over A, then it makes quite a difference which election system one uses. In a system where the candidate with most votes wins (like in the US presidential elections (per state)), then candidate A wins; a system with two rounds, with in the second round a vote between the two candidates with most votes (unless a candidate had a majority in the first round), like in the French presidential elections makes candidate B win. But also the two-round system can give situations with an outcome, disliked by the majority of the voters, especially if there are many candidates that get a relatively small percentage of the votes in the first round. Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) proposed a system that is much `fairer', but unfortunately rather complicated. I was thinking if I could design a chess variant based on that system, but decided that that is not easy to do - players should understand the rules. So, here is a chess variant where a winner is decided, but not with a Dodgson system. Of course, the variant has elements of the famous Alice Chess, another chess variant inspired by the work of Lewis Carroll.


The game is played by four players. Each player plays for himself. A player has the following pieces: seven pawns, two rooks, two knights, two bishops, and one queen. The game is played on two boards, each of size 6 by 7. The setup is as follows.


Pieces move like in ortho-chess (FIDE-rules), with the following exceptions:

Winning the game

The game ends when all pieces of a player have been eliminated. Every player gains points, as follows: Promoted pawns count for the value of the new type. For instance, suppose white is the first player that is eliminated. Wbite once promoted a pawn to rook. Black has taken the queen of white and two pawns. Red has taken two rooks and two bishops of white. Green has taken three pawns, two knights, and the rook that resulted from the pawn promotion, of white. Then black gets 3+1+1=5 points, red gets 2+2+2+2 = 8 points, and green gets 3+2+2+2=9 points, so green wins the game.

Ties are broken in favor of the player that took the largest number of rooks from the eliminated player, and if that doesn't help, in favor of the player that took the smallest number of pawns. If there is still a tie, then there are multiple winners.

Note that only pieces taken from the first eliminated player count towards the victory.


It is allowed to make agreements. One can start by making many exchanges, or players at the same side of the board may agree not to fight to heavily at start.

The principle of winning might also be tried out on a normal 2d board with multiple players.

A variant is where pawns promote to pieces that move like pawns but in all directions (mFcW), and keep a value of 1.

Written by Hans Bodlaender.
WWW page created: June 5, 2002.