Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

~~Later~~ ⇩Reverse Order⇧ ~~Earlier~~

Jurassic Chess. Dinosaur based chess variant played with regular chess pieces. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Sun, Dec 2, 2012 07:17 PM UTC:

One possible symmetric varant: Use all pieces and set up as FIDE chess. The king (one of the two T-rex each player has) is automatically considered general. Place checkers underneath to represent a T-rex having been hit once.

(Alternatively, use rooks to represent T-rex so that they can be flipped once hit?)

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Mar 30, 2010 03:00 PM UTC:

What is elephant?!!!

2nd LT SOCOURES wrote on Wed, Jul 25, 2007 02:50 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

FUN!AND GREAT IF YOU HAVE ONLY 1 CHESS SET

bert wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2004 01:56 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

cool game! are you going to keep improving on this game?

Joseph wrote on Fri, Jun 25, 2004 04:35 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

well it is quite a good game. very original. i think the idea of a general should be implemented in more games. i love those whacky moves.. especially the utaraptor attacks... you can never see them comin. being a dino-buff myself (when i was a kid atleast) i'd have to say its a pretty impressive game.

Arvind Pillai wrote on Tue, Apr 27, 2004 03:51 PM UTC:

yes it is  true that a player with only velociraptors and pterodactyls
would have a slight disadvantage but the disadvantages would be
considerably lessened because:

1. the other player would have to face to problematic situation of
destroying 4 velociraptors.

2. the utahraptors would be more or less demoralised since there are no
velociraptors to build the attack.

3. the general would be able to kill elephant in a single try.

4. most of his attacks would be really slow (due to elephants)

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Apr 25, 2004 08:17 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

Wouldn't it be better to have the four pieces that move 1/2 squares diagonally and two pieces that move 1/2 squares vertically or horizontally?

donna wrote on Fri, Apr 23, 2004 03:23 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

hmmm i did play this game a few times since i saw the earlier comment. not a bad game at all. however i just have one query.. wouldnt a player with only pterodactyls and velociraptors have a disadvantage?

matt wrote on Fri, Apr 23, 2004 11:17 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

wow! nice game. i played a few games with my friend and we had loads of fun!! i recommend playing this game. its very different.

💡📝Arvind Pillai wrote on Mon, Aug 18, 2003 03:02 PM UTC:

Im glad you guys liked my game. im thinking about improving this game further. could you suggest some new peices.

tee wrote on Sun, Aug 17, 2003 12:36 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

very nice game!!!keep up the good work

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Aug 15, 2003 11:54 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

not a bad game. the utahraptor and the t-rex are fun to use and i like the idea of the general.

arvind pillai wrote on Thu, Aug 14, 2003 04:48 PM UTC:

note that there is a mistake in the third line of the description of the utahraptor. However if it attacks an elephant it is put back to its original position. elephant is supposed to be t-rex.

13 comments displayed

~~Later~~ ⇩Reverse Order⇧ ~~Earlier~~

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.