[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ][ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ][ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]Comments/Ratings for a Single Item Later ⇩Reverse Order⇧ Earlier Jurassic Chess. Dinosaur based chess variant played with regular chess pieces. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating] (zzo38) A. Black wrote on 2012-12-02 UTCOne possible symmetric varant: Use all pieces and set up as FIDE chess. The king (one of the two T-rex each player has) is automatically considered general. Place checkers underneath to represent a T-rex having been hit once. (Alternatively, use rooks to represent T-rex so that they can be flipped once hit?) Anonymous wrote on 2010-03-30 UTCWhat is elephant?!!! 2nd LT SOCOURES wrote on 2007-07-25 UTCGood ★★★★FUN!AND GREAT IF YOU HAVE ONLY 1 CHESS SET bert wrote on 2004-08-22 UTCExcellent ★★★★★cool game! are you going to keep improving on this game? Joseph wrote on 2004-06-25 UTCExcellent ★★★★★well it is quite a good game. very original. i think the idea of a general should be implemented in more games. i love those whacky moves.. especially the utaraptor attacks... you can never see them comin. being a dino-buff myself (when i was a kid atleast) i'd have to say its a pretty impressive game. Arvind Pillai wrote on 2004-04-27 UTCyes it is true that a player with only velociraptors and pterodactyls would have a slight disadvantage but the disadvantages would be considerably lessened because: 1. the other player would have to face to problematic situation of destroying 4 velociraptors. 2. the utahraptors would be more or less demoralised since there are no velociraptors to build the attack. 3. the general would be able to kill elephant in a single try. 4. most of his attacks would be really slow (due to elephants) Anonymous wrote on 2004-04-25 UTCGood ★★★★Wouldn't it be better to have the four pieces that move 1/2 squares diagonally and two pieces that move 1/2 squares vertically or horizontally? donna wrote on 2004-04-23 UTCGood ★★★★hmmm i did play this game a few times since i saw the earlier comment. not a bad game at all. however i just have one query.. wouldnt a player with only pterodactyls and velociraptors have a disadvantage? matt wrote on 2004-04-23 UTCExcellent ★★★★★wow! nice game. i played a few games with my friend and we had loads of fun!! i recommend playing this game. its very different. 💡📝Arvind Pillai wrote on 2003-08-18 UTCIm glad you guys liked my game. im thinking about improving this game further. could you suggest some new peices. tee wrote on 2003-08-17 UTCExcellent ★★★★★very nice game!!!keep up the good work Anonymous wrote on 2003-08-15 UTCGood ★★★★not a bad game. the utahraptor and the t-rex are fun to use and i like the idea of the general. arvind pillai wrote on 2003-08-14 UTCnote that there is a mistake in the third line of the description of the utahraptor. However if it attacks an elephant it is put back to its original position. elephant is supposed to be t-rex. 13 comments displayedLater ⇩Reverse Order⇧ EarlierPermalink to the exact comments currently displayed.