Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Later Reverse Order EarlierEarliest
PBMWaitingRoom[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Jose Carrillo wrote on Thu, Feb 28, 2008 10:37 PM UTC:
Just a suggestion. 

The Game column in the waiting room should link to the CV game page for reference to the game instructions to those not familiar with the variants open for challenges.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 03:15 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Welcome to the club, we have ratings too, thx to Fergus

Dan Kelly wrote on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 02:02 AM UTC:
[Dan Kelly deleted all of his comments]

Stephen Stockman wrote on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 12:27 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
ANNOUNCING THE 2006 WORLD CHESS VARIANT CHAMPIONSHIPS
SPONSORED BY TAURUS GAMES

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS WILL BE PLAYED IN THE FOLLOWING GAMES

4-WAY CHESS

MODERATE PROGRESSIVE CHESS

DELUXE CHESS

You may play in any one game or as many as you want. The winner of each 
section will receive a chess crown, photo will be supplied soon. Any 
person who plays in at least one section may add one game to the list. 
Players always have the option to only play in the sections they want 
to play in. The first player to win 10 games in round robin format 
win's the championship for that game.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Wed, Feb 1, 2006 01:34 AM UTC:

I have now replaced links to the Waiting Room, this page here, with links to the Logs page with the status filter set to open invitations. The Logs page provides a more versatile way to view invitations, displays them more compactly, and defaults to listing them in reverse chronological order.


🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Jul 8, 2005 11:34 PM UTC:
Describe the problem in more detail.

Nasmichael Farris wrote on Fri, Jul 8, 2005 02:02 PM UTC:
I also was having difficulty offering invitations.

Roberto Lavieri wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2005 02:37 PM UTC:
Two different players are waiting for contendors in Avalanche Chess. I think the game can start, if one player accepts the invitation of the other one.

Greg Strong wrote on Fri, May 27, 2005 02:45 PM UTC:
Game Courier invitations still don't work. When issuing an invitation, I get: <p>Warning: fopen(/home/chessvar/public_html/play/pbmlogs/opulent_chess/mageofmaple-cvgameroom-2005-146-654.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/chessvar/public_html/play/pbm/create_log.php on line 21 <p>Failed to write to the file /home/chessvar/public_html/play/pbmlogs/opulent_chess/mageofmaple-cvgameroom-2005-146-654.php. <p>Also, I can no longer save changes to my presets, I get similar permission errors. Sorry to be the bearar of bad news...

Greg Strong wrote on Wed, May 25, 2005 05:14 AM UTC:
There seems to be a problem with invitations. When I issued an open invitation, I got errors about not being able to write. The What's New page then showed the newest game courier invitation 5 seconds ago, but the game logs page didn't list it, so I don't think it was actually created.

Andreas Kaufmann wrote on Sat, Dec 4, 2004 10:13 PM UTC:
The last comment was by me...

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Dec 4, 2004 10:12 PM UTC:
Yes, if two clicks would only fill up an edit field this would be already very good. On SchemingMind.com they use JavaScript, so that the move can be entered without connection to server. I think the same would be nice here. It 's fine not to have any check for valid moves or highlight the move. Text entry is certainly very flexible, but it takes more time, especially when playing on unusual boards (like circular) or with non-standard pieces.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Dec 3, 2004 05:24 PM UTC:
That wouldn't be compatible with all browsers, and it could never be flexible enough for all variants, particularly variants with cards. The most I might do is allow clicking on spaces as an alternate method of filling in the moves field, but I'm reluctant to do that, because it may end up confusing users who would expect it to be more fully functional than it would be. For example, it would not be able to highlight squares or to identify legal moves ahead of time. Other online systems can do such things by custom-designing the interface for specific games. But Game Courier is designed for flexibility and generality, and so it requires a general and open-ended input format, and a text field is the most general and open-ended input format available. Anyway, point-and-click is not an essential feature, it is not so much more difficult to type your moves, and it does a player good to think about the actual coordinates he is moving his pieces from and to. So I don't expect to be adding anything like this anytime soon.

Andreas Kaufmann wrote on Fri, Dec 3, 2004 07:39 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Would be nice to have possibilty to move by clicking with mouse on starting postion in diagramm and then on the destination position. This is how most of other game sites work.

Greg Strong wrote on Sat, Jul 24, 2004 12:11 AM UTC:
ah, ok ... didn't notice the differences...

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sat, Jul 24, 2004 12:02 AM UTC:
David Paulowich never made a page for Unicorn Great Chess, but it is a different game than his Unicorn Chess.

Greg Strong wrote on Fri, Jul 23, 2004 10:24 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
<p>I love this Game Courier. It really is fantastic!</p> <p>A <i>very tiny</i> bug report though, and I don't know if this is actually a problem with the GC or not, but when viewing the list of games in progress, and you click on 'Unicorn Great Chess' you get the description of <a href='/historic.dir/indiangr1.html'>Turkish Great Chess</a> and not <a href='/large.dir/unicorn.html'>Unicorn Chess</a>. In fact, I'm not sure the 'Great' belongs at all.</p> <p>Thanks again! I'm so glad that I can play these games online! Now I just need to get around to reading the Developer's Manual ...</p>

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Wed, May 5, 2004 03:58 PM UTC:
Rhengin,

Your requests are too vague for me to know what you want, and your tone is
too hostile for me to care. Learn to make polite, specific requests, or
learn to go without what you want. I know nothing of this Chinese gambling
game that is supposedly the same as Nuclear Chess, and I am highly
skeptical of your claims that they are the same. Nuclear Chess is based on
Western Chess, and it is not a gambling game. And if Chi Zode is so
popular, why did I get zero hits when I typed it into Google?

Rhengin wrote on Wed, May 5, 2004 06:22 AM UTC:Poor ★
Your navigation in poor!  I want to log in and invite my friends to play a
popular Chinese gambling game called 'Chi Zode'!  The 'Chess Variant'
game 'Nuclear Chess' is the same thing!  Could you please fix this and
have better navigation and less self-referential links? 

Thank you,
Rhengin Xi Lao Tsangi

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Tue, Apr 6, 2004 12:01 AM UTC:
You can't change the time controls of an invitation. What you can do is delete one invitation and issue a new one with different time controls.

Gwidon Naskrent wrote on Mon, Apr 5, 2004 10:23 PM UTC:
How do I change the time controls once an invitation has been set up?
Thanks for help :)

Roberto Lavieri wrote on Mon, Apr 5, 2004 09:26 PM UTC:
'If you move within the bonus period of zero seconds, you will gain a
bonus of 1 day.' 
Is this a bonus per move?. I think it is not. The period for being
bennefited with the bonus is of zero seconds, i.e., if you don´t play
immediately, you can´t gain any bonus. Please revise it

Gwidon Naskrent wrote on Mon, Apr 5, 2004 08:03 PM UTC:
What did I do wrong with setting game time? Is 5 moves per week with a
bonus time of 2 days per move in any way strenuous? Please enlighten a
newbie, thanks.

Roberto Lavieri wrote on Mon, Apr 5, 2004 12:15 PM UTC:
To the people that want to play: Please define reasonable time controls. Some potential contendors may be discouraged to play if the time controls are too exigent ('Gwidon Naskrent': May you reconsider the rithm of play, bonus time, etc?)

Ben Good wrote on Wed, Feb 25, 2004 05:54 AM UTC:
ok, i figured it out. but it's hardly easy to find. this page could definitely use some additional links and explanation.

25 comments displayed

Later Reverse Order EarlierEarliest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.