Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Nicholas Kuschinski wrote on Tue, Apr 8, 2003 05:40 AM UTC:
I thought about it for a while and have come to the conclusion that there is nothing wrong with this game. Although it could be argued that the fact that I managed to reach that conclusion so fast is evidence that the game is too simple, I find that the initial array, coupled with the existence of the sliders, is sufficient to make sure that the game will be complex enough to keep things interesting for the first several moves. The knights seem far less useful than the monks, since they aren't all that great for giving checkmate, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing at all. I also see no real problem with the ease with which a player can keep an opposing pawn from promoting either. Checkmates are kind of hard, but the size of the board helps a lot. Although suicide is extremely easy (getting your king out into the open requires very few moves, and will get him checkmated fast) there is no actual reason why this should affect gameplay at all, since it would take a pretty stupid person to want to shove his slider out quite so recklessly. The ideas are not genius, nor particularly original, but this game withstood any sort of tests I could think of to put it through, so it all seems to be in working order.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Opposition Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.