Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Danny Purvis wrote on Sat, Nov 2, 2002 12:07 PM UTC:
After 1.Ne3 Ne6 2.We2 Nc5 3.Wf2 Na6, White can force the harassed Knight
all the way back into the corner: 4.Wd3 Nc7 5.Wc3 Na8.  At first glance
White has made a lot of progress by harmoniously developing three pieces
while at the same time chasing a Black piece to a very inactive and
vulnerable square.  But I have so far not found a win here for White.  I
have also noted some virtues in Black's position.  His Warriors are
undeveloped but well-coordinated.  The wide separation of his Knights
perhaps makes them less vulnerable to double attack.  Anyway, White needs
to be careful.  After 6.N1c2, 6...Ng7 is a winning counterattack.

I hope the specified starting position does hold up, because I think it is
pleasing, classical, appropriate in appearance.  I have experimented a
little with stabling the two camps in opposing corners but have not found
that arrangement as attractive.

Eight horses on 64 squares yields an acreage of 8 squares per horse. 
Twelve horses on 100 squares would give an almost equal amount of freedom
per horse.  I am wondering if twelve horse kuniegit on a 10x10 board also
might be an interesting game.  If so, it would be less of a toy game, more
respectable in the eyes of a supercomputer.  But eight horse kuniegit is a
good practice game for building chess skills and thus it is very
appropriate that it can be played with standard chess equipment.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Kuniegit

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.