| More Information on this item |
Our Featured Variant: Try the Chinese game of Xiangqi, one of the most popular and enduring Chess variants in the world.

Rate this page! | Skip to comments
Bill Taylor and Joao Neto reinvented in the spring of 1997 this game, not aware that what they invented actually already existed. They wanted to create a chess variant that had the following properties:
All have been short, though, this doubtless reflects our inexperience, rather than an intrinsic property. Though one can't get so many moves of one's own in, in each move series, the fact that one can move the opponent king means a different sort of danger is always present, as the games below show.
Anyway, we are rather pleased with the game, and earnestly recommend keen chess varianters to give it a go.
In fact, we intend to run an email tournament later in the year; so get some practice in now!
We have little idea of strategy etc yet, but this thought has occurred to me, that seems to suggest that black has a slight advantage in this variant. If you look at move-color sequences, efficient mate is only possible if you have the last move of your sequence with your own color. Otherwise you have an "unusable" move. Checking this out, we see...
moves pieces mate plus W B w b moves helps ------------------------------------ 1 - 1 - 1 . . 2 1 1 1 . 3 . 1 2 1 1 . 4 2 2 2 1 5 . 3 2 3 2 . 6 3 3 3 2 7 . 3 4 3 3 . 8 4 4 4 3..and so on. The left 2 columns show whose move it is. The next 2 show whose pieces he moves. The next, the number of his own pieces moved; this is the crucial one. The last is also quite important, the number of opponent "helpful" moves he gets to make - this excludes the last one, if it was last of a series, (this move is often worthless).
So this tells how close each player can come to giving mate. As you can see, black keeps getting an extra gain of 1, every 4th series.
If this is a correct analysis, it seems a nice automatic correction to the generally-agreed slight 1st-move advantage to white in ordinary progressive chess.
Progressive Orthodox Chess Game 1
White: Bill Taylor; Black: Joao Neto.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Progressive Orthodox Chess Game 2
White: Joao Neto; Black: Bill Taylor.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Progressive Orthodox Chess Game 3
White: Bill Taylor; Black: Joao Neto.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For author and/or inventor information on this item see: this item's information page.
Created on: April 02, 1997. Last modified on: March 01, 2001.
Provide feedback on this page!
|
|
Last modified: Monday, December 22, 2008