Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

This is a fantastic game and one that I regularly enjoy playing both with friends or on my own. When playing on my own I change clothes after each move, speak in a different accent and have a different personality/backstory to give the appearance of separate players. Anyway I digress, a fantastic game, enjoy.

yes i used to go out with the good doctor, a fantastic person, wouldn't
shut up about flyingchess though .. lol, just kidding :)
yeah, interesting game, is it an original idea?
i don't know much about those 'multi-board' games, i don't know if a
piece on say level 2 influences things on level 1 and level 2 at same
time, so i find hard to rate, but i wouldn't rate it anything less than
good that is for sure. i'll wait for more info till i rate, wish it was
on a bigger board though, than the one that marek has put out.
of course, Fergus is totally right about the 'sus' early comments about
the good doctor, if these people knew the doc, surely the doc would of
commented here, or didn't you tell him we were talking about his game :)
anyway, i do like the idea and game.

Harrold Pooter, 

As you yourself have acknowledged, I do have a point. Moreover, I have not
castigated you, I have no control over what you feel like, I have not
treated you with disrespect, and I have not treated you like an outsider.
It is an unfortunate fact of life that the dishonesty of some people
sometimes casts doubt on the honesty of others. You yourself have accused
Ho Mosley of dishonesty. It may be that you have been honest with us, but
the similarity between your comment and the ones that followed, all
purportedly by different people, has given reason for doubting this. Even
if your comments are unrelated to those that followed it, there is the
appearance of a coordinated campaign to hype up both Flying Chess and
David Eltis. You may just be the victim of circumstances, and if you are,
I wish merely to see you exonerated. But I can't do it for you. Only you
can provide the information that will clear you of suspicion, and so far
you haven't done this. Although you have given the name 'Harrold
Pooter,' it has not helped. A Google search on this name turned up zero
pages.

I may as well be clearer about what I suspect. There is only one person I
know of who would have a motive for hyping up this game and its inventor.
That is David Eltis himself. It is my suspicion that all three of you are
David Eltis using different aliases to hype up this game. But I have
difficulty accepting this suspicion as fact, because David Eltis is an
acclaimed author and college professor and even a fellow alumnus, since we
both got our Ph.D.s at the same university, and I would expect such a
person to act more ethically. But I have never met him myself and have no
firsthand knowledge of his character. So I just don't know what to think.
I would prefer to think that my suspicions are wrong, and that is why I
have asked for the evidence that they are. If none of you are David Eltis,
I would appreciate knowing this for a fact, because I don't want to
believe that he would stoop to underhanded tactics to hype up himself and
his game.

I wrote the first review out of respect for the game and for it's
inventor
Dr. David Eltis I was therefore horrified to be castigated by 'Fergus
Duniho' who wants me to add some more 'credibility' to my review.

I made the review for the benefit of others and feel that it is unfair
that I should be made to feel like a victim...I do, however, see your
point when writing about such people as 'Ho Mosely' who clearly
doesn't
exist as he manages to use phrases such as 'peace out'. i would though
like a bit more respect in the future, just because I am not a member
doesn't mean that I should be treated like an outsider, I feel that my
views are still useful.

These recent comments in praise of both Flying Chess and David Eltis seem
suspicious. They all arose within a span of three days, and none are from
members or anyone previously known to post comments on these pages. All
praise the game highly, but none gives a single detail on why the game is
any good. And all highly praise the inventor himself. All of the praise in
these comments is written in the style of hype, not in the manner of
thoughtful evaluation.

I would like to ask those who have posted these messages to prove my
suspicions wrong. Please give verifiable evidence that you're real
people, and please give some details on what you like about this game.
This would add a lot to the credibility of your comments.

I couldn't agree more! Having met the man (David Eltis)in the flesh
myself, I can honestly say that he is truly the most dedicated and
inspired person I have ever known. The game itself adds another dimension
(excuse the pun) to an already polished and hugely satisfying 'battle of
wits', and my only sadness is that it hasn't been quicker in reaching
the general public as a bonified chess variant.

Verdict: a must try for all experienced chess-players!