Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Because the Pawns are very different from Fide-pawns, I think the pre-set would be better if Pawn graphics were replaced with one of the many King-like graphics. If I played this game I would constantly be battling my mind's desire to see the Pawns as Pawns.
On a similar note, the Knight piece is not a Knight, so a different graphic to remind us of this would be good.
George: You may be interested to learn that (mostly anonymous) comments and ratings were posted on many variant pages, under an previous system. Here are two web pages
[1] Recent Ratings and Comments by Title (2001 to 2002)
[2] Ratings and Comments for: Chaturanga - one of the pages referenced there - which contains the memorable line: 'this is completely in error, chataranga is a four player game pre-dating crist, you dopes'. Well, not every posting is worth reading.
First used Cetina's Sissa is the 'Knight', actually moving to Nightrider and Rook squares, but not like they do. In Second Board above, 'Sissa', or 'Knight', on c3 may capture Rook on c5 by Four-Fold pathways: c3-d3-e3-d4-c5, or c3-d4-c5-d5-c5, or c3-b3-a3-b4-c5, or c3-b4-a5 b5-c5. No pieces intervene, but if they did, any one pathway would be sufficient to move and capture c5 from c3. Sissa's 'N-Rider' squares are reachable by two-fold pathways. No Bishops' conversion rule like in Sissa Chess.
12 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
I think it'd be more appropriate to use the Pawn name and graphic for that piece; otherwise, nice going on that ID.