Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
I'm not an editor but I agree with Ben R. This entry is at best a joke, or at worst an attempt to demonstrate that anything can be published on the CVP.
I would say that this page was made in 3mn with a smartphone. thosam looks like a typo of Thomas.
I don't think just changing the starting setup of Capablanca chess qualifies for publication, unless you can provide reasoning to support that the new setup is superior or at least leads to significantly different (and interesting) gameplay?
And of course you would need to complete/correct the description. Your other open submissions similarly lack substance and/or clarity of description.
3 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
I'm deleting this, as the author has not been active since shortly after its creation, he never explained how this is supposed to be an improvement of Capablanca's Chess, and it's not evident that it is.