Comments by Nuno Cruz
I was just browsing the pdf of Falkener Book (available on line for download) and I noticed that for Tamerlane chess he modified some piece names for people of the west (Americans in this case but also true for Europeans) to better understand them. Some names that he gave to pieces were precisely the ones given in this variant. Most probably the inventor was familiarized with Falkere's book.
the link for this site is: en.grinningbit.com
The paint cane said it was good for ALMOST all plastics..
The book they are standing on is the 'Classified Encyclopedia of chess variants'
The camel is like my piece 'fetiche'. OK OK.. it is lame.. awkward, weak.. it doesn't even worth two pawns(?!).. etc, but it still feels like one of the most logical fairy pieces to add to a game, and in this particular, to a decimal game.
Hope you like the pics. they are poor quality because were made with a cheep mobile phone.
In this picture we can see the Camel compared to the Bishop and a pawn.
I took a look at his post. I can see that it is an http link. That requires me to upload the pictures to a site first. I do not have one, only blogs :( I was hoping I could upload directly to the comment. Thanks Nuno Cruz
Can you please help... I would like to post some pics on a comment. How can I do that? Many thanks! Nuno
about the size of the elephants... make sure their ears are small. We are talking about Indian elephants (Chaturanga) not African ones! : D
(Note: This commment those not belong to a page?) Very interesting because it really seems that that was the purpose of the 'inventor' of chess. Rook, Alfil and Knight to be like the three types of pieces that complemented each other... Historically the first record we have of this (0,2) piece is the Camel in a Decimal chess of Baghdad supremacie era... and also comes convergent to John Ayer theories! It seems logical. We are just missing the proofs. :)
Take a look at this: http://www.mobygames.com/game/amiga/distant-armies/screenshots Nice. And old.... (1988) :)
It seems that in India there was a bit of differences from one region to another. That is not surprising. Today we are living in a world that always want to 'standardize' things... but when there where now papers, TV, telephone or any means of communication but the spreaded word or the occasional manuscript, things tended to get local 'colors'. Chess was not different. Only with Islam it first appeared a standard version of chess (in the west of course..) On the same page of Murray where this account is given it also appears the movement of the Burmese (or silver general) piece but referig to the Punjab in India. There is now doubt that it was the ancestor of the moves on this local varieties. The quest for the discovery of the first version of chess is becoming so much more intriguing... and fascinating. :-)
14 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
(Forbes, page 141)
Is this true? I had the idea that, even colorbound, the Ferz was slightly more valuable..