Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Gary Gifford wrote on Wed, Jul 19, 2006 04:26 PM UTC:
Carlos:  You ask, 'Why does the cannon have to launch over a piece? what
was wrong with having it launch to any of the eight squares? too hard to
defend?'  

GKG Reply:  Carlos, thanks for the question.  I could have made the game
as you describe, but I prefer the way it is now because:

a) the Cannons retain some resemblance to Xianqi cannons, i.e., the idea
of leaping over a piece is retained--- though here we are doing it for
placement of a piece, rather than a capture.

b) More important is the offensive/defensive aspect.  If you see that a
Cannon is ready to shoot a piece to a vacant square you actually have a
chance to do something about it.  It can't launch if the row is vacated. 
If you have two or more pawns and/or pieces adjacent on the same row (rank)
then you also can inhibit the opponent.

The Cannon can shoot over friend, or foe... so you can try to set up a
launch with your own piece or pawn.

I have played several games of this and have had fun seting up my own
Cannon launches while also trying to thwart the launches of my opponent.

It is my opinion that good Cannon technique (both offensive and defensive)
adds an interesting level of tactics and strategy to the game.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Cannons of Chesstonia

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.