Check out Alice Chess, our featured variant for June, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
MSambitious-amphibies[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Lev Grigoriev wrote on Fri, Apr 26 12:48 PM UTC:

This page is now ready.


HaruN Y wrote on Sun, Apr 28 09:57 AM UTC:

I was also thinking about CwDA Army where each piece can move like a Trebuchet (H) & it's almost exactly like this except instead of Frog (FH) I use Brogop (BH). I called it Treacherous Trebuchets.


Lev Grigoriev wrote on Tue, May 14 07:35 AM UTC:

Can we test the balance of this army against FIDEs? I’ve played against Daniel Zacharias as white Amphibies and won easily. Then I decided to make them black. How it’s now?


H. G. Muller wrote on Tue, May 14 08:46 AM UTC in reply to Lev Grigoriev from 07:35 AM:

The army seems weak. Rule of thumb is that leapers with 8 targets are similar in value to Knight, with 12 targets slightly weaker than Rook, and with 16 targets about half-way between R and Q. And on 8x8 leaps longer than two are usually worth less than those to the first two 'rings'.

Because of the distant leaps the initial position might not be quiet, so that you can gain some material in the opening to restore the balance. (But a single H move is not that dangerous, as it has no forking power.) But even if that was the case, a non-quiet start position is not a good trait.

And I think the proper English word is 'Amphibians'.


4 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.